(From: http://euler.truthbible.net/index.php?entry=entry090127-232143)
1. Continue to apply for new account to upload the banned animation, then email me or Ohmygod@truthbible, post the link to youtube video in your website/blog. Please state in CLEAR and concise manner that the link to youtube video is what you just uploaded, and place also the link to banned video. We perfer YOUTUBE for several reasons:
A. To embrasses YOUTUBE;
B. To act as undeniable evidence that YOUTUBE has exercise censorship base on the content of the uploaded video.
2. Use email/telephone/fax to complain against YOUTUBE’s censorship at its Hong Kong substation in Chinese, and in English to the mother company of YOUTUBE: Google in USA. Please send us a copy as an evidence that a complain is lodged against YOUTUBE, to prevent YOUTUBE using time to dilute the negative effect on its own misbehavior.
3. Complain that to Media, Newspaper, TV/Radio station in your country, and email/fax one to me or OMG as a reference. Then you can place the complain in your website/blog along with the name of media/reporter; that is to give the media public press. And let us identify who is truly speaking for the people.
4. Ask the Atheist/Secularist/Humanist/Liberal of all nations to translate this banned Bible animation to their own language and upload to the YOUTUBE server located at their own country. That is extending the effect of 1 globally. We could also initialize the competition for the Best Bible Animation, to make truthbible the hub for Global Atheism/Secularism/Humanism/Liberalism. Let’s make Banned Bible Animation a symbol of speech freedom!
Now I had been busy waging war against YOUTUBE’s indecent censorship of Atheist video(Bible animation), maybe it would tempt some of you to think I care only about the right and interest of atheist. Actually, how can I not aware of the pointless dispute in domestic violence ordinance waged by self-righteous Christian Right, but the acute concern is about HKSAR’s consultation paper on reforming(strengthening) censorship, or the so-called Article 23 of the Internet.It is trivial to see what Communist China’s plan in mind: First, Article 23 of the Internet; then copy the Article 23 from Macau, and lastly the Universal Suffrage completely under Communist China’s control. That is to tilt the playing field to the favor of Chinese Communist’s favor, namely DAB. This assignment either to be done by Donald Tseung, or the one replace him as the puppet head of HKSAR.
What is the game plan of Donald Tseung?
We can’t assume that HKSAR doesn’t know that such a proposal of strengthening censorship bodies would met with fierce opposition from liberals and Netizens, giving Pro-Democratic politician a handy cause to relay support after Edison Chen’s scandal.So the same storyline once again, BIG battle between Pro-Democratic and Pro-Beijing political parties; which giving another chance for the rising star of Pro-Democratic camp: League of Social Democrat to bring the battle to the footstep of conservative politician’s door literally. At the battle field of Legislative Council, what Donald Tseung is looking at the logical consequence of blood fight: All proposal to slightly change the government’s proposal are shut down by partisanship, allowing the original proposed reform of censorship passed.
Or what Donald Tseung’s strategy is making the demand of the strengthening the censorship system so high that he don’t expect that to be truly implemented. He would then pretend to give it to the demand of Pro-Democratic parties and liberal in the middle, which is what original expected, so he is playing ‘hard to get’. Since the opening demand is so high: ISP filter the content before it reach any Netizen, when yield to the middle by ‘public pressure’ already fulfill his goal(like mandate filtering software for each parent demanded from ISP), then later Communist China can work behind the door with the software manufacture by expanding the keyword list. If this play well, his rating may boost despite a crack is already placed in the liberality of HKSAR.
The last case scenario is a familiar one just like Article 23. When he start the consultation of reforming the censorship system, what he expect is a dogfight by left and right so the proposal end up rejected. Such a would further deepen the wound between left and right, but the consequence would be the trouble of predecessor and Communist China, so it is not his concern. He satisfy the demand of Communist China by left the existing censorship system that is tilted to the favor of conservative intact, he step further to remain in the status quo.
This is the troublesome reality which HK is looking at. By simple logical extrapolation, Universal Suffrage can’t wait until 2012 or 2017 if it is to be implemented by HKSAR under Communist China’s rule.
If you are atheist, clearly this is a cause for concern. YOUTUBE banned the animation because ATHEIST are a minority in the world, therefore they can do whatever they like to us. Let’s demonstrate to them how ‘minority’ is us!
IIf you are an Atheist, clearly this is a cause for concern. YOUTUBE banned the animation because ATHEIST are a minority in the world, therefore they can do whatever they like to us. Let’s demonstrate to them how POWERFUL is when we are united!
If you are part of GLBT community, you are also the minority in the majority of countries; YOUTUBE would have the same mindset toward your group. Moreover, YOUTUBE can use the excuse of contain ADULT and SEXUAL material to prohibit your from expressing yourself in video.
If you are Christian, then YOUTUBE prohibited you from expressing your opinion using Biblical passage, and they can proceed to use excuse of violent and adult content to prohibit ANY PART OF BIBLE appear in YOUTUBE;
If you are non-Christian but a religious person; surely they can find some part of your ‘Holy Book’ inappropriate to some groups of people in the world. If YOUTUBE doesn’t like your religion, that is the precedent they follow;
If you are liberal, it is clear that our society can’t survive without adequately informed citizen. By banning this animation, YOUTUBE demonstrates that it has the means to make anyone submit to its opinion, and this time the opinion of YOUTUBE is ‘Bible is moral’.
If you are conservative, don’t you think that one day the tide may turn against you. And when your OPINION is unpopular(like Pro-Gun and Pro-Death penalty), you opinion would disappear from YOUTUBE just like ours?
Atheistdemo's Weblog 